[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] result tree fragments and node-sets
|
Subject: Re: [xsl] result tree fragments and node-sets From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 21:19:27 +0100 |
> but I was implementing according to what it said, Oh sorry (I might have known you'd be conformant) However, it sounds very dubious to me (while you're planning 2.0) especially if 2.0 has even more "new" features than 1.1 I'd like to be able to use the version attribute to maintain 1.0 behaviour. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] result tree fragments and, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] result tree fragments and, Chris Nolte |
| [xsl] Re: Re: A Generic template fo, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] Retrieving XML document's, David Carlisle |
| Month |