[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] ordering and iteration problem
Subject: Re: [xsl] ordering and iteration problem From: Jeni Tennison <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 09:33:51 +0100 |
Hi Mark, > I know that the source XML document has enough nodes since the > elements that I need to use the random nodes iteration hack for is a > subset of it. I don't know for sure if the XSLT transform document > will have enough nodes. I was just wondering why this "design > pattern" was typically described using "document('')//node()" when > "//node()" seemed to be more correct. If you have "elements that you need to use the random nodes iteration hack for" then you don't want to use the *random nodes* iteration hack, you want to iterate over the elements. If you care about the identity of the nodes that you're iterating over, then you should iterate over the nodes that you care about. Cheers, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] ordering and iteration pr, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] ordering and iteration pr, Jeni Tennison |
Re: [xsl] ordering and iteration pr, Jeni Tennison | Date | Re: [xsl] ordering and iteration pr, Jeni Tennison |
Month |