[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] Moving on, 1 to 1.1
Subject: Re: [xsl] Moving on, 1 to 1.1 From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 23:45:56 +0000 |
DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: > 1. Once you have a processor you can trust, start all new stylesheets using > 1.1 version? you don't have to. only the stylesheet which uses 1.1 needs to declare it as such. so you can have a 1.0 which imports a 1.1, and it does what is expected > 4. When a 1.1 processor is available, convert all old stylesheets from > 1.0 to 1.1? .. > Has anyone actually started to plan for this? in practice, how many problems can you see? i find 3 - use of the output splitting. thats easy to pin down and isolate - use of odd bits of Java extension. thats going to need some careful work, but how widespread is it? - the real one is seeing whether some bits of the stylesheet can now be rewritten more elegantly using (what was) node-set(). that, I think, is not so easy surely it depends how carefully you have written your stylesheets? I have always tried, for `public' stylesheets, to NOT use extensions, and keep my usage of them to non-public, non-production occasions. sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Moving on, 1 to 1.1, DPawson | Thread | [xsl] mismatched tags with xsl:if, Xavier Defrang |
Re: [xsl] namespace values, Mike Brown | Date | [xsl] retrive data from #1 xml via , Walter Torres |
Month |