[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1
Subject: Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1 From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 11:13:19 +0000 |
Jeni Tennison wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > I just wondered if you could expand on: > > > 5. Easy distribution of extension functions, a reason commonly cited > > for embedded scripting, can be addressed separately and does not > > necessarily have to be solved with the script metaphor, convenient > > as it may be. > > How would you like to see the easy distribution of extension functions > being addressed? > For me, I'd like to see things like *plucks examples from this morning's thinking-in-bath session*: RDF parsers (RDF has multiple elements or attribute serialisation options) or - for XSL FO or SVG - exsl:text-depth($text, $box-width, $font-name) distributed as exsl libraries. Francis. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to wit, Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to wit, Jeni Tennison |
Re: [xsl] [exsl] Draft 0.1 - call f, Francis Norton | Date | [xsl] Re: The top 10 limitations of, Joerg Pietschmann |
Month |