[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[xsl] FXPath - A comment on EXSL
Subject: [xsl] FXPath - A comment on EXSL From: David.Rosenborg@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 01:26:54 +0100 |
Hi, As a comment on the document "User-Defined Extension Functions in XSLT" (called EXSL here), written by Jeni Tennison, I've written a document about "FXPath - Functional XPath": http://www.pantor.com/fxpath/ In short: The purpose of this document is to outline an alternative approach to writing extension functions in XSLT. The FXPath approach is based on XPath where as EXSL is based on XSLT instructions. The basic idea is that functions dealing with primitive XPath types are better implemented in a language close to XPath rather than by retrofitted XSLT instructions. Cheers, </David> David Rosenborg Pantor Engineering AB XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Question on subtotaling, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] pruning nodes not in xpath li, Cliff McBride |
RE: [xsl] RE:"*NEVER* use for-each", Evan Lenz | Date | RE: [xsl] RE:"*NEVER* use for-each", David Schach |
Month |