[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] thanks, also thoughts on xsl:script and xsl:functi
|
Subject: Re: [xsl] thanks, also thoughts on xsl:script and xsl:functi From: Steven.C.Kienle@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 07:53:37 -0500 |
dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> Finally, wouldn't it be useful for <xsl:function> to return multiple
> items?
I would say that returning node-sets, where nodes can be full XML
tree-fragments (right?), provides that without having the mess up
the model.
Steve
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] which template?, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] Line breaks added during tran, Paul Signorelli |
| [xsl] which template?, Adriano Peluso | Date | Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Clark C. Evans |
| Month |
Keywords