[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

RE: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar f or call-template)

---

---

> From: Jeni Tennison 

> I must admit to being completely confused by XQuery. It seems like
> reinventing XSLT but without XML syntax for programming constructs
> (admittedly a fair step to take). I thought that it might be that
> XQueries are for building XML from things other than XML, but the
> XPath-like syntax seems to imply that the source (e.g. database) is
> accessed as a node tree anyway. I feel sure that I must be missing
> something.

The url I posted is for the 'English' / human version.
The XML version is yet to come, hopefully with aligned syntax.

Regards DaveP 

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

---