[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] RE; Re: RE: syntax sugar for call-template
Subject: RE: [xsl] RE; Re: RE: syntax sugar for call-template From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 21:33:29 -0000 |
> It is possible to have a positional only syntax form like in: > > fn(functionQName, p1="p1Value" ... pN="pNValue") > > ... The above will be directly usable from within an XPath expression. > Not within an XPath 1.0 expression it won't. Within the XSL+XPath conformance rules, we have the option of defining new extension functions and extension elements, we don't have the option of extending the XPath syntax. (If it weren't for that, I'd be perfectly happy with named arguments in function calls.) Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] RE; Re: RE: syntax sugar , Clark C. Evans | Thread | [xsl] Rick Jelliffe's comment on XP, Miloslav Nic |
RE: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] DYNAMIC SORTING, cool guy |
Month |
Keywords