[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments (node equality)
Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments (node equality) From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:29:18 -0000 |
> > a prefix form would be safer: same-node(a,b) although > that's probably a > > bad name since a and b would be node sets, even if they were "." . > > > I can't think of a better name off-hand - it's still testing for "same > node", even within it's node-set arguments. Would it be an > XPath or XSLT function? In Saxon I called this function has-same-nodes(a, b), it returns true if the difference between the two node-sets is empty. I think same-node(a, b) might suggests a function that returns true if the intersection is non-empty. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments (node e, Francis Norton | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, DPawson |
Re: [xsl] [XSLT] - Recognize an XML, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] [XSLT] - Recognize an XML, Michael Beddow |
Month |