[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
RE: feature request
Subject: RE: feature request|
From: "Pawson, David" <DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 10:33:19 +0100
> > So this is the way of the future for XSLT?
> > If you can't support something in a way that
> > works (entities), attempt to
> > convince people that they shouldn't even want
> > them in the first place ... ?
>I don't think its fair to blame XSL for all this. It is going with the
>flow of things like SAX and DOM, which do not provide access to
>entities. For XSLT to do otherwise would be to place a much bigger
>burden on the implementors.
I continue to use the kludge to get what I need?
No response from the editors?
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list