RE: xsl:copy problem

Subject: RE: xsl:copy problem
From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 09:24:43 +0100

> which is more efficient - using the xsl:variable as
> suggested below or using the current() function? 

Speaking for Saxon only: I think it's very unlikely to make any measurable
difference. Using current() is probably a microsecond or two faster, unless
you need the variable for other reasons anyway.

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
RE: xsl:copy problem, (continued) Dave . Porter - Thu, 27 Apr 2000 14:39:00 +0100 Kay Michael - Thu, 27 Apr 2000 16:07:27 +0100 Dave . Porter - Thu, 27 Apr 2000 17:25:08 +0100 Charlie Cox - Thu, 27 Apr 2000 11:45:26 -0700 (PDT) Kay Michael - Fri, 28 Apr 2000 09:24:43 +0100 <=

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: xsl:copy problem, Charlie Cox	Thread	RE: Microsot parser is OK (Was: Re:, Kay Michael
RE: Simple Problem, Kay Michael	Date	RE: Template Question, Kay Michael
	Month

	XML Editor \| XML Author \| WYSIWYG Editors \| Schema Editor \| XSD Documentation \| XSL/XSLT Editor \| XQuery \| XML Databases \| SVN Client © 2002-2011 SyncRO Soft Ltd. All rights reserved. \| Sitemap \| Privacy Policy \| This website was created & generated with <oXygen/>®XML Editor

xml editor

RE: xsl:copy problem