[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: Dumb question from a newbie on XSLT in IE5 (Namespaces etc)
Subject: Re: Dumb question from a newbie on XSLT in IE5 (Namespaces etc) From: Dan Morrison <dman@xxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2000 16:45:55 +1200 |
John E. Simpson wrote: > > At 01:08 AM 04/02/2000 +1200, Dan Morrison wrote: > >... does this attitude mean that there can > >never be an XSL 2.0? XML has a version, but that may move faster or > >slower than the changes that will be made to XSL. > > I suspect that's probably the reason why the current spec requires a > version="1.0" attribute to a conformant xsl:stylesheet element, as well as > the xmlns declarations. :-) Again I've missed something there. You're quite right it's clearly there in the spec. Must be something to do with the fact that out of all the example stylesheets I've got floating around, neither the Cocoon examples or the IE examples I've been working from bother with such a value. Funny everything still processes OK... In fact the only xsl I can find that does so is one downloaded from those folk that did the Netscape plugin. This is where learning from example fails I guess, if your teachers have got it wrong in the first place... *sigh* .dan. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Dumb question from a newbie on , John E. Simpson | Thread | string-length, Ben Sorek |
Re: XML+XSL= XML only?, Nicolás Lichtmaier | Date | string-length, Ben Sorek |
Month |