[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: XML+XSL= XML only?
Subject: Re: XML+XSL= XML only? From: "Nadig, Balu S" <bnadig@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 18:04:29 -0500 |
OK, here goes the big pool of characters... We would like to build a service on our messaging infrastructure that would apply XSL to XML to produce: 1) HTML (for the browser client) 2) XML (transformed messages to the middleware publishers/subscribers) 3) SQL (to RDBMS) 4) Cobol Copy book formats...(to the mainframe legacy apps) Our middleware infrastructure running on UNIX, NT and MVS provides an efficient (request/reply and publish/subscribe) message transport. We would like to build a message transformation service that would give the applications the data they want by applying XSL to XML, as real-time data flows (let's assume XML messages) thro' the middleware infrastructure. Yesterday, the XML/XSL course instructor 'kind of" indicated XML+XSL was 'intended' to produce XML only. I just wanted to know the views of the 'learned' ones in this community. Thus, XML+ XSL= XML only? Regards Balu Nadig PS: 1) I have some understanding of XML and XSL technologies. Hence the reference to 'learned ones...' 2) Just wanted to apologize for the typos. Hence last line. 3) I was in a hurry. Hence the cryptic XML+XSL=XML only equation. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XML+XSL= XML only?, Jens Lautenbacher | Thread | reposting questionFW: a kind of sil, Neelam Checknita |
RE: Namespaces, Jonathan Marsh | Date | RE: MSXML Namespace, Jonathan Marsh |
Month |