[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: following-sibling
Subject: RE: following-sibling From: "Pawson, David" <DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 07:53:32 -0000 |
Carole E. Mah <body> <p>this is ok</p> <hr> This is <b>bad</b>, naked CDATA, that even <i>Tidy</i> does not rectify. <hr> <p>this is also ok</p> </body> I had just the same experience with the open e-book DTD. pcdata within a container. Drawing pretty pictures of children and siblings made me understand it. With *here* as body child p this is ok child hr child text() this is child b bad child text() naked... etc. Viewed this way its far clearer to see which are siblings of the current node. Yet another design pattern?? Regards DaveP XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: following-sibling, Carole E. Mah | Thread | Why isn't with-param allowed within, Andrew Kimball |
computed path expression, Jon Smirl | Date | xsl:if, Wielenga, Geertjan |
Month |