[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: XSLT performance - C++ vs. Java
Subject: RE: XSLT performance - C++ vs. Java From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 14:30:14 -0000 |
> I should have made that clear. My times are not from > beginning to end of command line execution. I am performing the transformation > inside my own Java code. I don't start the clock until immediately before > the call to perform the transformation and I stop the clock upon return from that > method. Doing this you've cut out a lot of the cold-start overhead from your timing but not all. I generally run the thing three times, the second and third times round are about 70% of the first time cost. I think this is because of Java class loading and incremental compilation. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSLT performance - C++ vs. Java, Mark Volkmann | Thread | using XT to process Web resources, Richard Lander |
Re: Updated XSL support in IE5?, G. Ken Holman | Date | RE: Updated XSL support in IE5?, Kay Michael |
Month |