[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: vendor neutral XSL extension namespace ?
Subject: RE: vendor neutral XSL extension namespace ? From: "Richard Reich" <richard@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 6 Nov 1999 17:29:23 -0800 |
And damn the language lawyers, SAXON's <assign> element would be real nice too. -r > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Sebastian Rahtz > Sent: Saturday, November 06, 1999 2:26 PM > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: vendor neutral XSL extension namespace ? > > > Tony Graham writes: > > The other side of the question is how do you decide what goes into > > "Common XSL" and how often does it change. I'm sure that most users > > welcome the idea of common extensions that will increase > > interoperability of their stylesheets and let them use more of other > > people's, but who decides what's "common"? > > We could start with the list of desirables at the end of the XSLT > spec; the items cited (grouping, writing to separate output > documents) are already there. Just agreeing on names for some of > those would be nice. > > Sebastian > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: vendor neutral XSL extension na, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | Re: vendor neutral XSL extension na, David Carlisle |
Re: vendor neutral XSL extension na, David Carlisle | Date | Re: chords and lyrics notations via, G. Ken Holman |
Month |