[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: Scalability problem
Subject: RE: Scalability problem From: DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 14:44:00 +0100 |
>> For the benefit of the editor, >Why be kind to editors? but anyway... 'cos I'm the editor in question<grin/> > >> in doc.xml, it fails because of the contained >> doctype declaration in the files sectn.xml > >One possibility is to make the source files of each section _not_ >have a doctpe then have each sect1.xml just consist of the DOCTYPE >and an entity reference to the file containing the body of the section. >The doc.xml similarly can refer to the three files with the section >bodies, not the sectn.xml files. Just testing understanding.. doc has entities which refer to sect content sect-header-n also refers to same entities? (bypassing the header files?) > > >> Fine.... except I want to use <xsl:number >> to have consistant numbering across the suite >> of documents (Implies I need all 3 sections >> visible / part of the same source tree????) > >If making the entire document visible to the XSL processor just to >get the numbers right is too large a price to pay you could make the >starting section number (and any other context information) >a parameter of the stylesheet so you could go No, with the above solution, I have figured out I can use the section number (position()) to get the section numbering, apparently xt has no problems with big files, its just me :-) I might even post a demo solution (now that would be a first). Thanks David. Appreciated. Regards, DaveP XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Scalability problem, Rick Geimer | Thread | Re: Scalability problem, David Carlisle |
Announcing SAXON 4.7, Kay Michael | Date | RE: Scalability problem + solution, DPawson |
Month |
Keywords