[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: New XSLT draft

Subject: Re: New XSLT draft
From: "Alistair MacDonald" <AlistairMacDonald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 10:13:20 +0100

I may have missed something, but ....

Is there any chance of an explanation for why the xpath WD jumped to using child::... instead of from-children(....) ?

Also, there is no mention of a for loop construct - despite suggestions that it could be implemented without breaking the side-effect free goal. I presume that this was discussed and eliminated (rather than ignored). Is it possible to find out the specific reasons why the WG decided against this ?

Alistair


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
Re: New XSLT draft, (continued) James Clark - Mon, 12 Jul 1999 09:03:55 +0700 Denys Duchier - 12 Jul 1999 10:04:09 +0200 Rick Geimer - Mon, 12 Jul 1999 09:34:43 -0700 Chuck White - Mon, 12 Jul 1999 10:21:07 -0700 Alistair MacDonald - Wed, 14 Jul 1999 10:13:20 +0100 <= James Clark - Thu, 15 Jul 1999 03:05:57 +0700 Alistair MacDonald - Thu, 15 Jul 1999 11:10:05 +0100

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: New XSLT draft, Chuck White	Thread	Re: New XSLT draft, James Clark
New SAXON release 4.4, Kay Michael	Date	Microsoft's take on XSL, Steve Slatcher
	Month

Keywords

xpath

Re: New XSLT draft

Products

Features

Shop

Resources

Support

Company