Re: New XSLT draft

James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The tricky bit is the lexer.  Once you tokenize things properly, the
> grammar is pretty straighforward.  Try this (I haven't tested this other
> than to run yacc on it):

Aha!  I didn't think of shifting this work over to the tokenizer, but
now that I see it, it makes a great deal of sense.  I finally
understand what section 3.7 was trying to tell me.  I actually managed
to tweak the original grammar to remove the conflicts, but now I'll
try it your way as it is clearly superior.  Thanks.

Cheers,

-- 
Dr. Denys Duchier			Denys.Duchier@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Forschungsbereich Programmiersysteme	(Programming Systems Lab)
Universitaet des Saarlandes, Geb. 45	http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/~duchier
Postfach 15 11 50			Phone: +49 681 302 5618
66041 Saarbruecken, Germany		Fax:   +49 681 302 5615


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list