[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: release of FOP
Subject: RE: release of FOP From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 20 Jun 1999 18:09:32 -0400 |
Hi James This is a good idea, we can start with FOP, follow the evolution of the specs then port it to C++. Sound like a reasonable scenario. regards Didier PH Martin mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netfolder.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of James Tauber Sent: Monday, June 21, 1999 8:51 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: release of FOP > to include FOP into Mozilla, we need the following steps: > > a) make a C/C++ version and package it as a XPCOM module I would suggest that it is too early to do that. XSL is still too much of a moving target and not enough of it has been implemented in FOP anyway yet. I would suggest effort would be better spent helping to get FOP to support more of the current XSL draft and *then* think about porting it. James XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: release of FOP, James Tauber | Thread | Re FOP release, Jeroen van Rotterdam |
Re: , Mark Edwards | Date | RE: , Mike Brown |
Month |
Keywords