[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: Leventhal's challenge misses the point
Subject: RE: Leventhal's challenge misses the point From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 09:59:28 +0100 |
> From: Guy Murphy [mailto:guy-murphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Firstly we are having a discussion here. We are all making > assertions based on experience. Chants of "where's you evidence" can start > getting childish in a forum such as this. On the contrary, it is childish (or at any rate amateurish) for a group of experts to discuss whether one facility or another is easier to use based on extrapolating their own personal experience. (Also, I think we're being rather unscientific about defining our metrics: are we after speed of learning, or about the efficiency, or effectiveness, or subjective satisfaction of trained users?) My own observation so far of the beginners who stray onto this list or onto comp.text.xml is that people new to XSL have a lot of "conceptual understanding" problems at first, which are quickly overcome after a few weeks learning. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Leventhal's challenge misses th, Guy Murphy | Thread | RE: Leventhal's challenge misses th, Andy Dent |
RE: Leventhal's challenge misses th, Heikki Toivonen | Date | Re: When not to <xsl:include>, Oren Ben-Kiki |
Month |
Keywords