[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: Is it possible to declare entities without a DTD
Subject: Re: Is it possible to declare entities without a DTD From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 23:56:41 -0400 |
At 11:09 PM 05/27/1999 -0400, Liam R. E. Quin wrote: >On Thu, 27 May 1999, John E. Simpson wrote: >> There's really (yet) no way to define an entity without a DTD > ><?xml version="1.0"> ><!DOCTYPE sock [ > <!ENTITY hole "a large and ragged tear about the left heel"> >]> ><sock>&hole;</sock> Lee -- thanks for eliding the rest of my reply: >But you don't need an >external DTD subset; just use an internal one that does >nothing but declare entities. :) ========================================================== John E. Simpson | The secret of eternal youth simpson@xxxxxxxxxxx | is arrested development. http://www.flixml.org | -- Alice Roosevelt Longworth XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Is it possible to declare entit, Kent Fitch | Thread | Re: Is it possible to declare entit, David LeBlanc |
Re: Is it possible to declare entit, Kent Fitch | Date | Comments of the CSS WG chair on XSL, Guy Murphy |
Month |