[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: Please help with XSL proselytizing
Subject: Re: Please help with XSL proselytizing From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 17:49:02 +0100 (BST) |
Guy> It's horses for courses. In some ways, yes, it rather reminds me of Emacs v vi. Some people insist on using vi when Emacs is clearly the OneTrueEditor, it's an argument that has happily gone on for a decade or more with no sign of abating. But there is a difference here. XSL will presumably be going to a vote of W3C to become a recommendation. What happens if these `xxx is harmful' threads result in a no vote? David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Please help with XSL proselytiz, Guy_Murphy | Thread | Re: Please help with XSL proselytiz, Guy Murphy |
Re: Formatting Object namespace URI, G. Ken Holman | Date | RE: XT, HTML, and &nsbp;, Mike Brown |
Month |
Keywords