Re: On loss of integrity with xsl:script...

> If however, we had a script tag, that we could escape to for those
marginal
> but essential tasks, might we not have exactly that, an escape. Something
> outside of XSL? In this way XSL could retain its "purity", and be
> implimented where needed in a robust, simple form, unadulterated, but
still
> catering for expedience outside of the XSL language itself with the script
> tag.

Another path to take might be to propose a separate standard script tag
and/or a guideline for adding scripting language support in XML formats.

<xml:script> anyone?

Don



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list