[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: Language is not markup and markup is not language.
Subject: Re: Language is not markup and markup is not language. From: David LeBlanc <whisper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 10:56:58 -0700 |
An early draft of XSL included the use of ECMA-script (javascript), but that was taken out for some, as far as I know, unexplained reason. My guess is that real world XML/XSL will end up with a <script> tag anyway (as was also mentioned by Guy Murphy). Dave LeBlanc At 09:58 AM 5/7/99 -0700, Rick Geimer wrote: >It's a little late now as far as XSL is concerned, but I sometimes wonder if it >would have been possible to simply take an existing language and massage it >into XML syntax. This could have accomplished the ease of processing goals you >mentioned above, allowed for greater flexibility, and helped speed adoption. > >Just a thought. Is there still room in that bunker? > >Rick Geimer >National Semiconductor >rick.geimer@xxxxxxx > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Language is not markup and mark, Rick Geimer | Thread | Re: Language is not markup and mark, Scott S. Lawton |
Re: Language is not markup and mark, Rick Geimer | Date | Re: Language is not markup and mark, David LeBlanc |
Month |