[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: About xsl:scripts
Subject: RE: About xsl:scripts From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 10:22:23 -0400 |
Hi Guy, <Comment> I've maintained from the start that XSL is a direct competitor for ASP. The reason why I assert this is because of the speed with which I was willing to bail out from heavy usage of ASP to using XSL, leaving ASP just as the glue. If I could as you suggest access and COM interfaces from XSL then I would look at dropping ASP completely. I'm not 100% sure as to the state of play with script within the MS XSL parser, as I haven't had chance to play with it fully. It doesn't however seem to be on a par with the IE, or IIS scripting hosts. As to whether these moves are deliberate on the part of MS, or the result of simple expedience with what has to be seen as an interim solution for MS with regard to XSL (pretty much as XML was in IE4) ::shrug:: time will tell... is MS ready to throw ASP away?... I hope so :) </Comment> <reply> I agree </reply> regards Didier PH Martin mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netfolder.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Replacing server scripts (ASP) , Jonathan Borden | Thread | Re: About xsl:scripts, Guy_Murphy |
RE: Grand Unification Theory (XSL/X, Didier PH Martin | Date | RE: Building a new tree, Bovone Stefano |
Month |