[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: XSL as a better XPointer

Subject: Re: XSL as a better XPointer
From: James Tauber <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 14:45:37 +0800

> Let me jump in to point out that there are many conceptual similarities
> between XSL patterns and XPointer. Also, the sky is blue. :-)

Also, it may be of interest to people reading this thread to have a look
at the archives. 
There was a discussion between Paul Prescod and I on this topic, just
after the first WD came out.

See in particular my posts:

http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list/archive/msg00632.html
http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list/archive/msg00647.html
http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list/archive/msg00656.html
http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list/archive/msg00699.html
http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list/archive/msg00748.html

James


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
XSL as a better XPointer Micah Dubinko - Sun, 11 Apr 1999 09:25:14 -0700 Didier PH Martin - Sun, 11 Apr 1999 13:34:08 -0400 James Tauber - Mon, 12 Apr 1999 14:45:37 +0800 <= Chris Lilley - Wed, 14 Apr 1999 19:04:09 +0200 Didier PH Martin - Thu, 15 Apr 1999 08:38:19 -0400 <Possible follow-ups> Jonathan Borden - Thu, 15 Apr 1999 10:02:41 -0400

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: XSL as a better XPointer, Didier PH Martin	Thread	Re: XSL as a better XPointer, Chris Lilley
RE: XSL as a better XPointer was RE, Jonathan Borden	Date	Re: The Cathedral and the Bizarre (, Guy_Murphy
	Month

Keywords

xsl

Re: XSL as a better XPointer

Products

Features

Shop

Resources

Support

Company