[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: CSS and XSL
Subject: Re: CSS and XSL From: Paul Prescod <paul@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 16:11:56 -0600 |
"Simon St.Laurent" wrote: > > At 11:30 AM 2/12/99 -0600, Paul Prescod wrote: > It's not too late to change CSS. One proposal for doing so and making it > more XML-friendly was put forward in http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-XSL-and-CSS, > and certainly signaled a willingness to accomodate XML. (No, it didn't > include breaking up the style attribute.) Yes it does. <css:chunk display="block" font-weight="bold" margin-top="20px"> Is what I like. <css:chunk style="display: block; font-weight: bold; margin-top:20px"> Is what I do not. My question is why the former XML-friendly convention was not used in SVG? > I was quite happy to see that SVG uses CSS as its style vocabulary, > personally. The vocabulary is fine. The syntax is not appropriate. -- Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco If you spend any time administering Windows NT, you're far too familiar with the Blue Screen of Death (BSOD) which displays the cause of the crash and gives some information about the state of the system when it crashed. -- "Microsoft Developer Network Magazine" XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: CSS and XSL, Simon St.Laurent | Thread | Re: CSS and XSL, Simon St.Laurent |
Re: Venting, Marcus Carr | Date | Fw: Heretical view, Oren Ben-Kiki |
Month |
Keywords