[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: Splitting XSL
Subject: Re: Splitting XSL From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 23:42:14 GMT |
> As of today, there'd be one DTD for XSL stylesheets, so we can verify the > input to an XSL processor You can't really use DTD for a general XSL can you? You'd need a different DTD for each result namespace as the elements of the result tree appear within the templates. This (extending a given DTD by allowing elements from a second DTD at the leaves) is supposed to be better handled by the schema proposals, once they get finalised. But yes being able to verify that valid input will aways produce valid output would be nice (but likely to get harder to do as more features are added to the language) David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Splitting XSL, Didier PH Martin | Thread | Fw: Splitting XSL, Oren Ben-Kiki |
Bluestone XML Product Family, Atkins, Jon | Date | Re: SGML output from XSL?, Chris Lilley |
Month |