[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: inconsistencies between XSL and XLL
Subject: Re: inconsistencies between XSL and XLL From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 12:09:56 -0600 |
I hear you discussing information from the XML Linking Language (XLink) WD [1] and Associating stylesheets with XML documents PR [2]. While your observation may be a reasonable one to raise, I don't see that this has anything to do with XSL (as implied by the subject of this message and the mailing list to which you sent it). Am I missing something? paul [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xlink [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/PR-xml-stylesheet At 22:47 1999 01 29 -0500, Didier PH Martin wrote: >The whole exercice about the stylesheet processing intruction lead me to see >a certain inconsistency between XLL and the style sheet PI. In the last >recommendation, the PI is stated as <?xml-stylesheet....?> and was in the >previous proposal <?xml:stylesheet...?>. XLL links according to the latest >posted proposal are expressed as <A xml:link="simple" >href="http://www.w3.org/">The W3C</A>. Why do we have to kind of notation > >a) xml-stylesheet >b) xml:link > >On based on namespaces and the other on ????. Is it because W3 want to >distinguish processing instructions from other kind of markups? Is the >implicit rule (but not stated anywhere) that xml-something is for processing >instructions and xml:something is for other stuff like pointers or other >kind of objects? Will W3 publish a paper to clarify this? XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: inconsistencies between XSL and, Didier PH Martin | Thread | RE: inconsistencies between XSL and, Didier PH Martin |
Re: Announcement, XSL-List Owner | Date | About the style processing instruct, Didier PH Martin |
Month |