[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: More entity confusion and my opinion on the right way
Subject: Re: More entity confusion and my opinion on the right way From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 09:33:48 GMT |
> Chris Olds is absolutely right, and the .pen files look like valid > XML. The only question remaining is: why ".pen"? I was just trying to follow what seemed to be an existing convention. The page does say at the top: The extensions attatached to the files match the conventions described at http://www.altheim.com/specs/ents/, specifically: .gml SDATA 'square bracketed' strings; .ent CDATA numeric character references (not used here) .pen XML-compatible Unicode numeric character references I have no idea what the `p' in .pen is supposed to mean:-) David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: More entity confusion and my op, Chris Maden | Thread | Error in WD XSL DTD..., Tyler Baker |
Re: GOTCHA!, Oren Ben-Kiki | Date | Re: GOTCHA!, Guy_Murphy |
Month |
Keywords