[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: alternating tags in a list?
Subject: RE: alternating tags in a list? From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 13:33:42 -0500 |
Hi Guy, This is right. We tested xsl with scripts written in: - vbscript - JavaScript - Perscript - Pythonscript - MCLScript and it worked well with all. In fact, it will work with any script engine supporting the the IActiveScript/IActiveScriptParse interfaces. As you noticed MCLScript is not as known as the others. We created it by implementing the former interfaces and it worked as well with XSL. So, as long as an interface is defined, any script language iplementer could add value to what's already there. This is an open architecture. Any language independant interface system would also do the job as well. Didier PH Martin mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netfolder.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 1998 12:31 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: alternating tags in a list? Hi. I believe with the IE5b2 version of XSL you can use any scripting language with an ActiveScripting implimentation. Cheers Guy. xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 12/16/98 07:12:59 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID) Subject: Re: alternating tags in a list? keshlam@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >From: "Lawton, Scott" <slawton@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> From: Paul Prescod [mailto:paul@xxxxxxxxxxx] > >> My guess is that inline ECMAScript will: > >> * reduce the number of actual XSL implementations, > > > >Whatever the merits of your other reasons, I don't think this one is > >compelling. For better or worse, ECMAScript is already a standard and > >browsers already implement it. > > Please remember that not all styling runs in browsers. And even in the > browser arena, ECMAScript isn't the only language in play. > > The Right Answer would be an API that allows _multiple_ languages to be > plugged in, if that can be done. Among other things, that increases the > odds of being able to talk to other software systems if you need to do > something _really_ obscenely complex in your styling (such as using the > data to generate a reference to a dynamically-created bitmap). I don't think this idea would be too hard to implement. Of course this would make your XSL not cross-platform as you would be depending on an external language to process some of your data, but the people who will need this functionality in all likelihood will be doing the transformations at the server level in which case this would not affect the client at all. In this case, escaping to another programming language for processing would be much like calling native functions using JNI in Java. Just have a simple function syntax where you pass parameters (this would be where closer integration with the DOM spec could be very useful) to an external environment and a processed node is returned. I have no objections to this as client browsers could choose to have JavaScript processing support, Java processing support, PERL processing support etc. as they see fit. At the server level, you can do whatever the heck you want. Tyler XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: alternating tags in a list?, Guy_Murphy | Thread | RE: alternating tags in a list?, Lawton, Scott |
Re: < in <xsl:eval>, Keith Visco | Date | Re: alternating tags in a list?, Paul Prescod |
Month |
Keywords