[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: syntax feedback
Subject: Re: syntax feedback From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 14:48:54 +0000 |
Hi. On the subject of CSS, I don't think it ties up the resources of any proffesional Web designer. CSS is a no-brainer. In terms of excitement factor, by way of experiment I wrote some XSL to transform The Complete Works of Shakespear, into a Web site with navigation, and links into the play from an abstracted view of the acts and scenes etc. It took me a week-end including the time it took to learn the in-and-outs of basic XSL. Changing the implimentation would be trivial. CSS can't reorder, XSL can... that's exciting. Hell, it's not just exciting, it's essential. In terms of XSL difficulty. I am not a rocket scientist. I like to think of myself as a competent Web developer, but I'm not one of those gurus pouring forth SGML from one hand and DSSSL from the other. I certainly have had no experience with DSSSL-o or other such tools, and for the life of me I don't see the difficulty with XSL. There's precious little to it. Yes the pattern matching can get a bit deep, and I'm still exploring there, but you don't have to swallow all of to produce useful results. I really do wish people would stop comparing CSS and XSL and how XSL is more difficult. C++ hurts my head, all the rigid typing hurts my head. I'm not up to it, so I don't persue a career in C++. Instead I work with lightweight languages like ECMAScript/XML/XSL... I don't expect C++ to be bent out of shape because it doesn't suit me. If I have to use C++ for a job then I have to get the manual out and work hard at it. JavaScript *cannot* do what C++ can do, and C++ is needed for the job it does. CSS *cannot* do what XSL can, and XSL is needed for the job it does ....or will do :) Cheers Guy. xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 12/14/98 03:47:22 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID) Subject: Re: syntax feedback At 04:19 PM 12/13/98 -0600, Paul Prescod wrote: [SNIP] I fear it may hobble both, as developers struggle over which to support with the most resources. XSL is more 'powerful' in that it provides transformation, but otherwise I'm afraid it's not that exciting - unless you've had experience with the tools that have inspired its particular direction of development. [SNIP] XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: syntax feedback, Simon St.Laurent | Thread | Re: syntax feedback, keshlam |
Re: syntax feedback, Chris Lilley | Date | Re: syntax feedback, Sebastian Rahtz |
Month |
Keywords