[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: syntax feedback
Subject: Re: syntax feedback From: Daniel Glazman <Daniel.Glazman@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 15:03:36 +0100 |
Paul Prescod wrote: > If you need > transformation, then you don't really have any choice about whether to use > CSS or XSL and there is also no competition. CSS can't even handle a > simple cross-reference (nor should it be extended to! It's good at what it > does) False. You are mixing two things : CSS and other concepts using CSS general syntax. We (Electricité de France) modify HTML and XML fragments using a transformation language based on CSS syntax. Not CSS, a different spec. > According to our own informal survey, these technologies are not in > contention, direct or otherwise. They are complementary. I already gave my opinion on the very large panelization of this survey... </Daniel> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: syntax feedback, Daniel Glazman | Thread | Re: syntax feedback, Paul Prescod |
Re: syntax feedback, Chris Lilley | Date | Re: syntax feedback, Chris Lilley |
Month |