[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: alternatives to XSL (was RE: Microsoft extensions)


Subject: Re: alternatives to XSL (was RE: Microsoft extensions)
From: Paul Prescod <papresco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 13:30:48 -0600

"Lawton, Scott" wrote:
> 
> Other than OmniMark's (at $60K, I'll create my own thank you), what tools
> exist to transform XML to HTML?

I'm a little lost in the thread, but as I understand it, someone specified
"commercial" at one point? Why? XML to HTML is a trivial problem that has
been solved with free software since before there was an XML. If you are
into easy scripting language, Python is just as easy as Javascript and a
hell of a lot more powerful.
-- 
 Paul Prescod  - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

At today's pop doubling rates, in 100 years there will be 20 billion
people, more than enough to fill the earth. In 300 years, we will have
filled up 16 earth-sized planets (roughly, our solar system). In 2300
years we will have filled up 200 billion earth-sized planets (roughly,
our galaxy). Only one technology can save us: birth control.


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



Current Thread
Keywords
xml