[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: Interactive XML
Subject: Re: Interactive XML From: Paul Prescod <papresco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 14:10:46 -0500 |
Parenthesized prefix syntax has been fighting mixfix since long before the 1970s. There is no sense in which mixfix is the 'old, bad stuff' and parenthesized prefix is the 'new, good stuff.' They are both old and their relative goodness is entirely in the eyes of the beholder. Paul Prescod Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > > Paul Prescod writes: > > same standard library. Typically the ECMAScript version will be more > > readable to the typical programmer because it uses a more conventional > > syntax and less constrained ("side-effect-free") data model. > > "typical", "conventional"? is the next century to remain dominated by > those who learnt their computing in the 1970s? > > sebastian > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list -- Paul Prescod - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco Three things trust above all else: Your knowledge of your craft That someone turns a profit, and that you will get the shaft http://www.geezjan.org/humor/computers/threes.html XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Interactive XML, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | Re: Interactive XML, Martin Bryan |
Re: How to do XML to XML translatio, Chris Maden | Date | RE: How can I get real path ?, Jonathan Marsh |
Month |