[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: Interactive XML

---

---

I second this opinion. I have been experimenting with various
implementations of client/server parsers. The implementations
that I have found are very varied and need some direction. These
isssues should be addressed from the get go.

Bill Lindsey wrote:

> The working draft of the requirements summary for XSL [1] speaks
> to the need to support interactive behaviors with mention made
> of input events, forms, and the editing of structured documents.
>
> The initial submission to the W3C [2] appears to focus solely
> on static rendering.  So far, the discussion here has a similar
> focus.
>
> I can see a huge value in having a vendor and platform neutral,
> declarative language for specifying user interfaces to structured
> data.  In fact, I'm looking at a great potential application
> in the health care field right now.  I'm curious if others
> share that view, and how much thought and work has gone into
> this aspect of XSL so far.  Is this a version 1.0 issue? Or
> does it wait till we get hung punctuation nailed?
>
> Just curious,
>
> Bill
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-XSLReq
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-XSL.html
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



--
**************************************************************
Carlos Elizondo
Office 303-792-0576 x25
mailto:cae@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

TeleSynthesis, LLC
40 Invernes
Englewood, CO 80112

http://www.telesynthesis.com/
**************************************************************



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

---