[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
XSL formatting model
Subject: XSL formatting model From: Lee Fife <lee.fife@xxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 15:51:23 -0600 |
I'm trying to understand what appears to be the WG's current intention to create a new formatting model, based on flow objects, for web output that is not equivalent to HTML 4 + CSS 2. Naively, this seems to be bad idea. Doesn't build off existing practice and implementations, goes against the market direction, complicates XSL and possibly reduces its acceptance. But, the folks on the WG are bright and experienced. I'm sure they're not heading in this direction w/o thought. So, explanation please? What's the rationale for abandoning the proven and deployed formatting model represented by HTML/CSS and attempting to develop a new model? (The only explanation I've seen offered so far is that the original XSL note described generating really ugly HTML that wouldn't behave well in various display environments. The obvious fix here is to generate better HTML, not to abandon the currently proven web display model.) -Lee XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XML Transformation Language (wa, G. Ken Holman | Thread | Re: XSL formatting model, Paul Prescod |
RE: XML Transformation Language (wa, G. Ken Holman | Date | RE: XML Transformation Language (wa, Rob McDougall |
Month |
Keywords