Re: [xml-dev] Schematron: Categories of Usage?

• From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@...>
• To: xml-dev@...
• Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:34:24 +0100

Basically I think Algorithmic checking is still the closest, although
the bad implication of that term is that one can check all algorithms
and one can't but one can certainly check things that are often
referred to as being algorithms.

For example a modulus-10 function check can be done on a number the
length of which is known at the time of the rule writing.

Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen

On 1/23/07, Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@...> wrote:
> On 1/23/07, Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@...> wrote:
> > Guillaume Lebleu said:
> >
> > > What about "Formula Checking" ?
> >
> > Equation checking?
> >
> Those sound like you're checking a Formula or Equation respectively.
> You want to reflect the fact that you are applying a set of
> computations on a set of values to check their validity. At the moment
> I can't do better than "Computed value checking" so I guess I
> shouldn't be throwing any rocks...
>
> --
> Peter Hunsberger
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@...
> subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@...
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>
>