[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Fw: [XCON] Consensus 66-03: Schema vs RelaxNG
- To: <xml-dev@...>
- Subject: Fw: [XCON] Consensus 66-03: Schema vs RelaxNG
- From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@...>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:52:08 +0100
Relevant to discussions earlier this month... Is the tide turning?
For background, IETF's XCON effort is for controlling operations within a
videoconference, for example participants' audio gains, side bar
conversations etc.
I think the proposal follows a similar move in the ECRIT group (which I'm
not familiar with).
XCON seems very data oriented, but I've heard that Relax NG is not suited to
this.
Mull?
Pete.
--
=============================================
Pete Cordell
Tech-Know-Ware Ltd
for XML to C++ data binding visit
http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx
(or http://www.xml2cpp.com)
=============================================
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Roach" <...>
To: "XCON-IETF" <xcon@...>
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 10:18 PM
Subject: [XCON] Consensus 66-03: Schema vs RelaxNG
> Spurred by the output from the data model editing session, the working
> group members present at the IETF 66 meeting of XCON discussed the
> potential use of Relax NG instead of Schema for defining the XCON data
> model.
>
> Among participants in the discussion, there was strong agreement to use
> Relax NG for the XCON data model.
>
> This message is to confirm that this direction has the consensus of the
> mailing list. Any objections to the decision should be raised promptly on
> the XCON mailing list.
>
> /a
>
> _______________________________________________
> XCON mailing list
> XCON@...
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon
>
|
