[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xml-dev] xml xsl web architecture
- To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@...>
- Subject: Re: [xml-dev] xml xsl web architecture
- From: "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@...>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:23:05 -0600
- Cc: xml-dev@...
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=QKsPGopzljmj3R07ZI8GcTWSb6JhbGrPUqZRRg/emdyOToci6f0lRItS5SdCPqV2ImQgfuYczrOydGFBHai6Mxr4pSnGbF9LT0+9VTFhjZQUcJ9A8Zrhir9J0DKtqAAv7eHUj5Fbq0gErRJKrgOYGb5HYKPLNHOK6t6V1Aifj9w=
- In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE0BB1FEF8@...>
- References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE0BB1FEF8@...>
On 2/27/06, Bullard, Claude L (Len) <len.bullard@...> wrote:
> Would XML schemata be more powerful if they included a formal record of
> their failures in transactions?
>
> How would one represent that?
>
> Does that intersect with XSL that operates over the schema-scoped instances?
>
Huh ? (What does this have to do with the question at hand?)
--
Peter Hunsberger
|
