Re: [xml-dev] [Summary] Best Practice for URI construction?

• To: Richard Lainchbury <freexe@...>
• Subject: Re: [xml-dev] [Summary] Best Practice for URI construction?
• From: Klaus Backert <Klaus.Backert@...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:58:39 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@...
• In-reply-to: <2cbc8d0a0512210644q89a3babj@...>
• References: <B8415163A689094689542C617ECA03665836EE@...> <2cbc8d0a0512210644q89a3babj@...>

Am 21.12.2005 um 15:44 schrieb Richard Lainchbury:

> I would add, that when passing dates in the GET string ie:
>
<snip>
>
> and if you are using a folder structure
> www.example.com/news/2005/10/04/
> that the international date standard is used.
>
> I would also say that each level should have the expected content  
> in eg.
> www.example.com/news/2005/10/ should have all the news articles from
> october 2005 in.

I have seen some web-sites delivering a table of content - instead of  
the content itself - in such a case (and not only for dates). This is  
good (best?) practice too, I think.

Klaus

• Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] [Summary] Best Practice for URI construction?
• Next by Date: RE: MusicXML 1.1 saving from Sibelius; XML document adoption rates?
• Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] [Summary] Best Practice for URI construction?
• Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] [Summary] Best Practice for URI construction?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread