Re: SV: [xml-dev] Names As Types

• To: "James Lindley Walford" <jlw@...>, "'Vladimir Gapeyev'" <vgapeyev@...>, "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@...>
• Subject: Re: SV: [xml-dev] Names As Types
• From: "Nathan Young" <natyoung@...>
• Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:04:52 -0700
• Cc: "XML Developers List" <xml-dev@...>
• In-reply-to: <D45A5694803BE943BA46F9A7262BF83D01A149A9@...>
• Organization: Cisco Systems
• References: <D45A5694803BE943BA46F9A7262BF83D01A149A9@...>
• User-agent: Opera M2/8.01 (Win32, build 7642)

Hi.

> Or possibly, to quote Wittgenstein, "meaning is use". The software  
> "coming
> out of this mess" indicates the meaning of the language by actually using
> it...

"the implementation is the spec"... For ages XML-RPC went along with that  
as the EXPLICIT state of affairs.  "Working implementation" literally  
meant "works with the userland implementation"

--->N

>
> I'm sorry I can't provide any Wittgenstein quotes regarding turtles.
>
> James Walford



-- 


.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:.

Nathan Young
A: ncy1717
E: natyoung@...

• Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Names As Types
• Next by Date: simple idea: 'SBXE'
• Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Names As Types
• Next by thread: SV: [xml-dev] Names As Types
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread