Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML Permathread, iteration N+1 - was Re: [xml-dev] Python and JSON vs XML???

• To: "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@...>, "Rich Salz" <rsalz@...>
• Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML Permathread, iteration N+1 - was Re: [xml-dev] Python and JSON vs XML???
• From: "Nathan Young" <natyoung@...>
• Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:10:28 -0700
• Cc: "Michael Champion" <michaelc.champion@...>, xml-dev@...
• In-reply-to: <cc159a4a05082611072a777f5b@...>
• Organization: Cisco Systems
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE072072E6@...> <e3a5cb2c050826100137be8246@...> <430F54D4.3030700@...> <cc159a4a05082611072a777f5b@...>
• User-agent: Opera M2/8.01 (Win32, build 7642)

On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:07:31 -0700, Peter Hunsberger  
<peter.hunsberger@...> wrote:

> On 8/26/05, Rich Salz <rsalz@...> wrote:
>> > the major use cases?  I'm keeping an open mind on that, but I fear
>> > that many major stakeholders want a different 20%.
>>
>> Which, according to conventional wisdom, is how/why XSD is what it is.
>> And there seems to be consensus to "do better."  Yet, as Liam observed
>> at the members meeting back in February, who else should do this but  
>> W3C?
>>
>> It's going to be very hard.  Irresistable forces create intractable
>> standards. :)
>>
>
> If only we had an immovable object or two for these forces to run  
> into....

Intractable standards = immovable forces???



-- 


.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:.

Nathan Young
A: ncy1717
E: natyoung@...

• Prev by Date: Limitations of XML as a remote service medium?
• Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Limitations of XML as a remote service medium?
• Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML Permathread, iteration N+1 - was Re: [xml-dev] Python and JSON vs XML???
• Next by thread: Python and JSON customer implementation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread