RE: [xml-dev] incompatible uses of XML Schema

• To: "'Bob Foster'" <bob@...>
• Subject: RE: [xml-dev] incompatible uses of XML Schema
• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@...>
• Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:31:19 +0100
• Cc: "'Gregor'" <iamgregor@...>,"'Rick Jelliffe'" <ricko@...>,<xml-dev@...>
• In-reply-to: <426FB544.6020602@...>
• Thread-index: AcVLQSN4IDj9elcVQK+XPhPE8TYzUgABPdlQ

> 
> How do you know it's 98% conformant? Or more generally, how 
> can one know 
> a given processor is xx% conformant? That would certainly move this 
> discussion out of the hand-waving stage.

Of course any number is arm-waving. If one had a set of conformance tests,
one could say how many of the tests are passed; but even then that doesn't
exactly correlate to how much of the specification has been implemented.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] incompatible uses of XML Schema
• Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] XSD spec question
• Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] incompatible uses of XML Schema
• Next by thread: ANN: Launch of worlds first Simple XML based Accounting System : ceBit Sydney 2005
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread