Re: [xml-dev] XSLT with DOM or SAX ?

• To: Chris Burdess <dog@...>
• Subject: Re: [xml-dev] XSLT with DOM or SAX ?
• From: "M. David Peterson" <m.david.x2x2x@...>
• Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 12:46:21 -0700
• Cc: XML Developers List <xml-dev@...>
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=t3cTfHBIdHpeQTnOVa7soY8iv2N5ylFMo5OO5G4ZY4pDLjaCHVRe5pmhwt5y8llp318OcJ+f838NAzjXvU0F5FcG961QHxYa/a2e01QZj+wnVfU4QfqcaNsOdKFIhK3SeywdCpSWkddfpC6yfAIkCr0fy2Ci0GKzno4p5zxdFhc=
• In-reply-to: <9a6a8e5453b3ef9bd0667a481623550d@...>
• References: <E1DFcEL-0004ZP-00@...> <db1e5a999923502eaceb50b06518b247@...> <f8da4eba0503280115101d1d20@...> <ee12f91a24d850d90d080dc79ee1fdd2@...> <f8da4eba05032806516da7bacf@...> <9a6a8e5453b3ef9bd0667a481623550d@...>
• Reply-to: "M. David Peterson" <m.david.x2x2x@...>

Yeah.  This is with the assumption that the mentioned libxmlj
implementation of libxml and libxslt uses the JAXP interface to
implement a transformation as this is the impression I received from
your first post.  Is this not the case?


On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:44:05 +0100, Chris Burdess <dog@...> wrote:
> M. David Peterson wrote:
> > Sweet!  Thanks for the info :)  I'm glad to see the agressive stance
> > to integrate this directly... I'm assuming by doing so you/they? are
> > able to shave some time off the clock?
> 
> Not really. I assume you're talking about the implementation of
> 
> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/javax/xml/transform/
> TransformerFactory.html#newInstance()
> 
> ?
> --
> Chris Burdess
> 
> 


-- 
<M:D/>

:: M. David Peterson ::
XML & XML Transformations, C#, .NET, and Functional Languages Specialist

• Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] XSLT with DOM or SAX ?
• Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] XSLT with DOM or SAX ?
• Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] XSLT with DOM or SAX ?
• Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] XSLT with DOM or SAX ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread