[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (byKohsuke
Elliotte Harold <elharo@...> writes:
>> You have a place in your XML document type for (e.g. hex-encoded)
>> BLOBs to be included or referenced. Each BLOB in turn should be an
>> encoding of something using one of a delimited set of more-or-less
>> standard encodings. You want to allow or require document authors to
>> signal which encoding they're using.
>
> How do notations improve on, for example, <data mime:type="image/jpeg"
> href="somefile.jpg"/>? Normally I like additional layers of
> indirection, but the NOTATION indirection has never seemed all that
> useful. What am I missing?
Not much. The benefits I see are
* some modest additional enforcement (your NOTATION-typed attributes
have to name declared Notations);
* some modest documentation/semantics support, in the form of the
System and Public IDs in the referenced Notation;
* some modest functional specification for free, i.e. the fact that
the NOTATION-typed attribute applies to its element's content.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@...
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
|
