Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")

• To: Wolfgang Hoschek <whoschek@...>
• Subject: Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
• From: Wolfgang Hoschek <whoschek@...>
• Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:45:50 -0800
• Cc: Elliotte Harold <elharo@...>, kjouk@..., xml-dev@...
• In-reply-to: <e3e82eebdc6fa9346729066b1497431b@...>
• References: <E1D2Si4-0001QA-00@...> <200502211623.51418.kjones@...> <421A0ECF.3090802@...> <200502220742.53890.kjouk@...> <421B03D2.6020803@...> <e3e82eebdc6fa9346729066b1497431b@...>

> joins with O(N * min(N,M)).

Actually hash joins have expected time O(max(N,M) + min(N,M)).

Wolfgang.

• Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
• Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema.
• Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
• Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread