Re: [xml-dev] Streaming XML (WAS: More on taming SAX (was Re: [xml-dev] ANN: Amara XML Toolkit 0.9.0))

• To: Karl Waclawek <karl@...>
• Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Streaming XML (WAS: More on taming SAX (was Re: [xml-dev] ANN: Amara XML Toolkit 0.9.0))
• From: Daniela Florescu <dflorescu@...>
• Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 15:55:17 -0800
• Cc: XML Developers List <xml-dev@...>
• In-reply-to: <41D09826.4000401@...>
• References: <1103757598.10272.67.camel@borgia> <20041223055359.GK25900@...> <1103791522.4600.68.camel@borgia> <1103792754.4600.81.camel@borgia> <41CB11D1.50600@...> <20041225094043.GA14697@...> <41CEFEED.7000802@...> <20041226200008.GA27205@...> <EED07622-5841-11D9-A33A-000393DC762C@...> <41D09826.4000401@...>

>
> When you write XSLT, why is that not "hand-coded"?

It's assembler-level "hand coding" vs. SQL-level "hand coding".
Sure, you can see both as "hand coding" if you want...

But do I really have to explain myself any further ?

Best regards,
Dana

• Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Streaming XML (WAS: More on taming SAX (was Re: [xml-dev] ANN: Amara XML Toolkit 0.9.0))
• Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Streaming XML (WAS: More on taming SAX (was Re: [xml-dev] ANN: Amara XML Toolkit 0.9.0))
• Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Streaming XML (WAS: More on taming SAX (wasRe: [xml-dev] ANN: Amara XML Toolkit 0.9.0))
• Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Streaming XML (WAS: More on taming SAX (was Re: [xml-dev] ANN: Amara XML Toolkit 0.9.0))
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread