Re: [xml-dev] Re: licensing ... [Re: binary XML API and scientificuse cases [Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] nux-1.0beta2 release

• To: Rick Marshall <rjm@...>
• Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Re: licensing ... [Re: binary XML API and scientificuse cases [Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] nux-1.0beta2 release
• From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@...>
• Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 17:40:22 -0500
• Cc: Aleksander Slominski <aslom@...>, xml-dev@...
• In-reply-to: <41A8FD2F.9000708@...>
• References: <71C38086EA230D43941DD0A3BAFF8CA9059526@...> <41A38ED4.1020109@...> <41A810CE.7000805@...> <41A8FD2F.9000708@...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910

Rick Marshall wrote:

> if it's right, and i suppose it is, then everything - ie EVERYTHING - 
> that runs on linux links to libc and therefore must be gpl (under linux 
> at least). that also implies that in the view of the fsf there is only 
> one "work" running on a linux system.
> 

No. This is not true. This is not the view of the FSF. Linking a work to 
the Gnu C library does not cause the derived work to be GPL-infected.

-- 
Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@...
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim

• Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Re: licensing ... [Re: binary XML API and scientificuse cases [Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] nux-1.0beta2 release
• Next by Date: Seeking SAXException pattern
• Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Re: licensing ... [Re: binary XML API and scientificuse cases [Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] nux-1.0beta2 release
• Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Re: licensing ... [Re: binary XML API and scientificuse cases [Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] nux-1.0beta2 release
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread